

Strengths and Weaknesses of Synthetic Mammography in Screening
Synthetic mammography principles are reviewed and the role of synthetic mammography in screening is discussed.
Course ID: Q00572 Category: Radiology Trends for Technologists Modality: Mammography1.5  | 
Satisfaction Guarantee  | 
$24.00
- Targeted CE
 - Outline
 - Objectives
 
This course has been approved for 1.50 Category A credits.
No discipline-specific Targeted CE credit is currently offered by this course.
Outline
- Introduction
 - SM Acquisition
 - Role of SM in Screening
- Reduced Radiation Dose
 - Shorter Acquisition Time
 
 - SM and Cancer Detection
 - SM versus FFDM
 - SM/DBT versus FFDM/DBT
 - SM and Recall Rate
 - Case Reviews of SMís Strengths, Weaknesses, and Artifacts
 - SMís Strengths
 - SMís Weaknesses
- 	SM Artifacts
- Subcutaneous Tissue Blurring
 - Loss of Skin Resolution
 - Decreased Axillary Contrast Resolution
 - Pseudocalcifications
 - Foreign-Body Artifacts
 - Difficulty in Assessing for Motion Artifact
 
 
 - 	SM Artifacts
 - Other Considerations
 - Future Directions
 - Conclusion
 
Objectives
Upon completion of this course, students will:
- state the year when the FDA approved DBT
 - list the limitations of FFDM/DBT, when compared to those of FFDM alone
 - state the year SM was approved by the FDA to be used in combination with DBT data
 - describe the SM process
 - describe the purpose of manufacturer-specific algorithms
 - state when the MQSA was enacted
 - describe the federal radiation dose limits enforced by the MQSA
 - contrast and compare multiple studies in regard to SM
 - name the organizations that have campaigns focused on raising awareness of the need to lower radiation dose of medically necessary studies
 - state the acquisition time ranges for DBT
 - list the benefits of shorter acquisition times
 - recall the prospective study that found SM had significantly better conspicuity than FFDM for calcifications and architectural distortions
 - recall the study that did not have a true screening population
 - list the strengths associated with SM
 - list artifacts experienced by the authors’ early clinical implementation of SM
 - describe the curvature of the compressed breast related to the compression plate to the Bucky grid
 - describe burned-skin artifact
 - describe the areas in the breast where decreased SM contrast resolution may occur
 - describe aspects of breast composition that may cause structural noise in SM
 - compare how foreign-bodies or metal artifacts appear on images from various modalities
 - recall how metal artifacts appear on breast images
 - list commercially available items that can help minimize artifacts associates with high-attenuation objects
 - describe areas in the breast where special attention must be placed in order to detect motion
 - recall the potential for SM to reduce radiation exposure
 - list factors that SM can help make more conspicuous